Saturday, February 15, 2020

Restorative justice, Inmate forgiveness, and the Right to Privacy Assignment

Restorative justice, Inmate forgiveness, and the Right to Privacy - Assignment Example To this end, the paper addresses the concerns of the family and restates the benefits of meeting the inmate. Introduction Restorative justice is a type of justice whereby the parties who have stake in crime, victims, offenders and their families together with the community, collectively agree on how to deal with the consequences of crime and its future implications (The Sage Dictionary of Criminology, 2005). It is based on the view that crime is not only a transgression against laws but also hurt human social interactions. Therefore, the main aim of this form of justice is to heal the damaged interpersonal relationship caused by the wrongdoer’s actions. To this end, restorative justice takes it that both the victim and offenders families are affected by the crime. Consequently, their participation is crucial in conflict resolution and justice administration. Q1. The restorative justice principles are in line with biblical teachings about justice which focuses on repentance, fo rgiveness and reconciliation (Miller, 2008). As so, the process gives the offenders an opportunity to understand and assess the impacts of their actions. Therefore, this form of justice does not address the injustice with harm or punishment. Consequently, it is not retaliatory in nature and therefore, yields great social benefits to the community. Instead of taking an eye for eye approach, which is a moral issue, it focuses on community members’ integration. In doing so, this form of justice recognizes that nobody is beyond the point of correction. Therefore, no matter the crimes committed, an individual must actively respond to crimes. The process of restorative justice may take many forms; restitution is one of them. Restitution refers to the process of compensating victims for the losses suffered as a result of the offender’s actions. It is founded on the view that when a crime is committed, the wrongdoer benefits at the expense of the victim. Therefore, for justice to prevail, the offenders should give back what they took from the victims as a whole or in part depending on the agreements reached. This is form of justice is also found in biblical teachings. There are texts in the scriptures that refer to the distribution of wealth in exchange for salvation for those who had unfairly accumulated riches. By practicing restitution, justice is given meaning through active involvement. For, there is no justice done when victims still feel that they have been denied their rightful entitlement. Q2. The application of restorative justice concept in criminal justice system has raised serious ethical issues. By its nature, the concept adopts reconciliation and compensation as possible methods of administering justice. Under, reconciliation a victim may accept to forgive the offender after face to face deliberations. However, the issue of whether or not the forgiveness is for greater social good is remains contentious. According to utilitarian theory, ac tions moral worthiness is gauged by the beneficial outcomes of such actions (Pollock, 2012). Consequently, based on this theory, some crime are not worth forgives because of their magnitude of harm. This includes crime against humanity such as genocide and terrorism which results into many deaths. Besides, besides, in as

Sunday, February 2, 2020

The marriage cure, inadequate solution of poverty Essay

The marriage cure, inadequate solution of poverty - Essay Example From ancient times a marriage supposed to be the effective tool to eliminate poverty. But is it an adequate solution today Literary critics express different views as for the Boo's article message. Some of them suppose that the research suggesting that governments and individuals tend to benefit from an increase in marriage rates is at this point very persuasive, and don't see much point in being coy about it. Marriage is probably the most cost-efficient antipoverty instrument a society possesses (Stewart, 2004). The author gives special detailed attention to the difficulty which can follow single women in marriage rush. The article describes the problems of two single women and the imperfection of the institution marriage at the beginning of the 21st century. In the article Boo describes the realities of a marriage promotion program and their outcomes for low-income woman. She wrote: "Still, the days now contained enough hours for a reasonable woman to fret about her future" (Boo, 2003). In one of her interview Boo argues that: "And if, inspired by that indoctrination, Kim, whose income was less than ten thousand dollars, manages to meet and marry a man who makes ten thousand dollars, their combined income would remove both of them... Boo criticizes the Bush's welfare reform to eliminate poverty by marriage and sees it as inadequate solution giving supported reasons. Some critics argue that success in the workforce may make women more independent and therefore more selective about the men they will consider marrying. In addition, more time at work means less time to pursue relationships, especially for single mothers whose time is already stretched thin (Stewart, 2004).. The important fact to note is that poverty is a complex problem which is difficult to solve in one day. Bear in mind the facts mentioned by Katherine Boo it is possible to say that if this problem of poverty can be solved by successful marriage, our society would not have poor creatures looking for better days. Race, gender, familial status, age, and place of residence are some but not all of the characteristics that enhance the risk of living in poverty. Boo gives a vivid examples contrasting with those "rosy dreams" proposed by Bush's administration. She describes that Kim's annual income was: "five thousand dollars, but, except for ten months when she and her husband first separated, she had not received welfare. The child support was supposed to have covered us, but when it stopped coming I couldn't afford a lawyer" (Boo, 2003). The marriage cure is nothing more than survival of time affected the mind of many single women. "Marriage promotion programs, therefore, must be viewed in the context of battered women's lives and how poverty and children affect their decision-making. Most moms I know will do anything for their children and this often includes putting up with years of violence and abuse. When you tell a woman who is desperately trying to keep a roof over her head, put food on